生物炭在农药残留吸附方面的研究进展及影响因素

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220947

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着农业现代化进程的推进,对农药的需求量急剧上升,再加之部分地区人员对农药的不合理使用,环境中农药的残留情况愈发严重,对人体的健康安全造成极大的威胁,农药残留去除变成亟待解决的问题。生物炭因为其生产成本低、来源广、孔隙度高和环境相容性好而成为一种极具前景的吸附剂,广泛应用于农药残留。本文简述了近年来国内外生物炭在农药领域的研究概况,重点分析了影响生物炭吸附效果的主要因素及原理,并对生物炭与农药间的发展方向作出展望。

关键词: 生物炭, 农药残留, 吸附, 影响因素

中图分类号:

S156.2

杨孔谈, 丰谷粮, 王许蜜, 吴欢琪, 张昌朋, 王祥云, 于晓斌. 生物炭在农药残留吸附方面的研究进展及影响因素[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(11): 2801-2806.

图/表 3

参考文献 55

[1]	刘玉灿, 董金坤, 秦昊, 等. 水中有机农药的去除方法研究进展[J]. 中国给水排水, 2020, 36(24): 45-53.
[2]	FARGHALI R A, BASIONY M S, GABER S E, et al. Adsorption of organochlorine pesticides on modified porous Al₃₀/bentonite: kinetic and thermodynamic studies[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2020, 13(8): 6730-6740.
[3]	SANZ-SANTOS E, ÁLVAREZ-TORRELLAS S, CEBALLOS L, et al. Application of sludge-based activated carbons for the effective adsorption of neonicotinoid pesticides[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(7): 3087.
[4]	JIA Z Q, LI Y, LU S, et al. Treatment of organophosphate-contaminated wastewater by acidic hydrolysis and precipitation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 129(1/2/3): 234-238.
[5]	BOUHALA A, LAHMAR H, BENAMIRA M, et al. Photodegradation of organophosphorus pesticides in honey medium by solar light irradiation[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2020, 104(6): 792-798.
[6]	NAZAROVA E A, NAZAROV A V, EGOROVA D O, et al. Influence of destructive bacteria and red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) on the pesticides degradation in the soil[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2022, 44(2): 399-408.
[7]	Al-DABBAS M M, SHADERMA A A, Al-ANTARY T M, et al. Effect of ozonation on cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos pesticides residues degradation in tomato fruits[J]. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2018, 27(10):6628-6633.
[8]	NEAMTU C, TUTUNARU B, SAMIDE A, et al. Reducing the ecotoxicity of pesticide polluted waters by electrochemical methods[J]. Revista De Chimie, 2019, 70(5): 1574-1578.
[9]	FILIPINAS J Q, RIVERA K K P, ONG D C, et al. Removal of sodium diclofenac from aqueous solutions by rice hull biochar[J]. Biochar, 2021, 3(2): 189-200.
[10]	PHUONG D T M, LOC N X. Rice straw biochar and magnetic rice straw biochar for safranin O adsorption from aqueous solution[J]. Water, 2022, 14(2): 186.
[11]	XIONG J, ZHOU M G, QU C C, et al. Quantitative analysis of Pb adsorption on sulfhydryl-modified biochar[J]. Biochar, 2021, 3(1): 37-49.
[12]	SUO F Y, LIU X, LI C S, et al. Mesoporous activated carbon from starch for superior rapid pesticides removal[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 121: 806-813.
[13]	MEHMETI V, HALILI J, BERISHA A. Which is better for Lindane pesticide adsorption, graphene or graphene oxide? An experimental and DFT study[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2022, 347: 118345.
[14]	D'ARCHIVIO A A, MAGGI M A, ODOARDI A, et al. Adsorption of triazine herbicides from aqueous solution by functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes grown on silicon substrate[J]. Nanotechnology, 2018, 29(6): 065701.
[15]	DURÁN E, BUENO S, HERMOSÍN M C, et al. Optimizing a low added value bentonite as adsorbent material to remove pesticides from water[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 672: 743-751.
[16]	YUAN J H, XU R K, ZHANG H. The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(3): 3488-3497.
[17]	VIGNESHWARAN S, SIRAJUDHEEN P, KARTHIKEYAN P, et al. Fabrication of sulfur-doped biochar derived from tapioca peel waste with superior adsorption performance for the removal of Malachite green and Rhodamine B dyes[J]. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2021, 23: 100920.
[18]	YANG L, TAN W F, MUMFORD K, et al. Effects of phosphorus-rich sawdust biochar sorption on heavy metals[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2018, 53(17): 2704-2716.
[19]	QIN P Z, HUANG D W, TANG R, et al. Enhanced adsorption of sulfonamide antibiotics in water by modified biochar derived from bagasse[J]. Open Chemistry, 2019, 17(1): 1309-1316.
[20]	DAYAN F E. Current status and future prospects in herbicide discovery[J]. Plants, 2019, 8(9): 341.
[21]	SUO F Y, YOU X W, MA Y Q, et al. Rapid removal of triazine pesticides by P doped biochar and the adsorption mechanism[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 235: 918-925.
[22]	JEVROSIMOV I, KRAGULJ ISAKOVSKI M, APOSTOLOVIĆ T, et al. Mechanisms of alachlor and pentachlorobenzene adsorption on biochar and hydrochar originating from Miscanthus giganteus and sugar beet shreds[J]. Chemical Papers, 2021, 75(5): 2105-2120.
[23]	KHORRAM M S, SARMAH A K, YU Y L. The effects of biochar properties on fomesafen adsorption-desorption capacity of biochar-amended soil[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2018, 229(3): 1-13.
[24]	MANDAL A, SINGH N, PURAKAYASTHA T J. Characterization of pesticide sorption behaviour of slow pyrolysis biochars as low cost adsorbent for atrazine and imidacloprid removal[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 577: 376-385.
[25]	ZHANG P, SUN H W, REN C, et al. Sorption mechanisms of neonicotinoids on biochars and the impact of deashing treatments on biochar structure and neonicotinoids sorption[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 234: 812-820.
[26]	SBIZZARO M, CÉSAR SAMPAIO S, RINALDO DOS REIS R, et al. Effect of production temperature in biochar properties from bamboo culm and its influences on atrazine adsorption from aqueous systems[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2021, 343: 117667.
[27]	MAYAKADUWA S S, HERATH I, OK Y S, et al. Insights into aqueous carbofuran removal by modified and non-modified rice husk biochars[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2017, 24(29): 22755-22763.
[28]	GAO Y, JIANG Z, LI J J, et al. A comparison of the characteristics and atrazine adsorption capacity of co-pyrolysed and mixed biochars generated from corn straw and sawdust[J]. Environmental Research, 2019, 172: 561-568.
[29]	CHA J S, PARK S H, JUNG S C, et al. Production and utilization of biochar: a review[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2016, 40: 1-15.
[30]	CHOI S S, CHOI J H, KIM S S. Treatment of nickel ions in water phase using biochar prepared from Liriodendron tulipifera L[J]. Applied Chemistry for Engineering, 2017, 28(5): 529-533.
[31]	KOŁTOWSKI M, CHARMAS B, SKUBISZEWSKA-ZIEBA J, et al. Effect of biochar activation by different methods on toxicity of soil contaminated by industrial activity[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2017, 136: 119-125.
[32]	GONG H B, TAN Z X, ZHANG L M, et al. Preparation of biochar with high absorbability and its nutrient adsorption-desorption behaviour[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 694: 133728.
[33]	YAKOUT S M. Monitoring the changes of chemical properties of rice straw-derived biochars modified by different oxidizing agents and their adsorptive performance for organics[J]. Bioremediation Journal, 2015, 19(2): 171-182.
[34]	WANG W, MA X L, SUN J, et al. Adsorption of enrofloxacin on acid/alkali-modified corn stalk biochar[J]. Spectroscopy Letters, 2019, 52(7): 367-375.
[35]	ZHANG Z L, LI Y, ZONG Y M, et al. Efficient removal of cadmium by salts modified-biochar: performance assessment, theoretical calculation, and quantitative mechanism analysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 361: 127717.
[36]	LIANG L P, XI F F, TAN W S, et al. Review of organic and inorganic pollutants removal by biochar and biochar-based composites[J]. Biochar, 2021, 3(3): 255-281.
[37]	KEARNS J P, SHIMABUKU K K, KNAPPE D R U, et al. High temperature co-pyrolysis thermal air activation enhances biochar adsorption of herbicides from surface water[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2019, 36(6): 710-723.
[38]	BAHARUM N A, NASIR H M, ISHAK M Y, et al. Highly efficient removal of diazinon pesticide from aqueous solutions by using coconut shell-modified biochar[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2020, 13(7): 6106-6121.
[39]	CELSO GONÇALVES A, ZIMMERMANN J, SCHWANTES D, et al. Renewable eco-friendly activated biochar from tobacco: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamics studies for chlorpyrifos removal[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2022, 57(2): 159-179.
[40]	TRIVEDI N S, KHARKAR R A, MANDAVGANE S A. 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid adsorption on adsorbent prepared from groundnut shell: effect of preparation conditions on equilibrium adsorption capacity[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2019, 12(8): 4541-4549.
[41]	HAMADEEN H M, ELKHATIB E A. Nanostructured modified biochar for effective elimination of chlorpyrifos from wastewater: enhancement, mechanisms and performance[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2022, 47: 102703.
[42]	WANG Y R, MIAO J B, SALEEM M, et al. Enhanced adsorptive removal of carbendazim from water by FeCl₃-modified corn straw biochar as compared with pristine, HCl and NaOH modification[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(1): 107024.
[43]	RALLET D, PALTAHE A, TSAMO C, et al. Synthesis of clay-biochar composite for glyphosate removal from aqueous solution[J]. Heliyon, 2022, 8(3): e09112.
[44]	TANG X Y, HUANG W D, GUO J J, et al. Use of Fe-impregnated biochar to efficiently sorb chlorpyrifos, reduce uptake by Allium fistulosum L., and enhance microbial community diversity[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(26): 5238-5243.
[45]	ZHANG Z Q, ZHOU C H, YANG J M, et al. Preparation and characterization of apricot kernel shell biochar and its adsorption mechanism for atrazine[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(7): 4082.
[46]	ZHAO L L, YANG F, JIANG Q, et al. Characterization of modified biochars prepared at low pyrolysis temperature as an efficient adsorbent for atrazine removal[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2018, 25(2): 1405-1417.
[47]	BATOOL S, ALI SHAH A, ABU BAKAR A F, et al. Removal of organochlorine pesticides using zerovalent iron supported on biochar nanocomposite from Nephelium lappaceum (Rambutan) fruit peel waste[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 289: 133011.
[48]	JACOB M M, PONNUCHAMY M, KAPOOR A, et al. Bagasse based biochar for the adsorptive removal of chlorpyrifos from contaminated water[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(4): 103904.
[49]	LEE S, HAN J, RO H M. Interpreting the pH-dependent mechanism of simazine sorption to Miscanthus biochar produced at different pyrolysis temperatures for its application to soil[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 35(7): 1468-1476.
[50]	IHSANULLAH I, KHAN M T, ZUBAIR M, et al. Removal of pharmaceuticals from water using sewage sludge-derived biochar: a review[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 289: 133196.
[51]	TULUN Ş, AKGÜL G, ALVER A, et al. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy interference system modelling for chlorpyrifos removal with walnut shell biochar[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2021, 14(12): 103443.
[52]	MA Y F, CHEN S Y, QI Y, et al. An efficient, green and sustainable potassium hydroxide activated magnetic corn cob biochar for imidacloprid removal[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 291(Pt 1): 132707.
[53]	CAO Y, JIANG S Q, ZHANG Y N, et al. Investigation into adsorption characteristics and mechanism of atrazine on nano-MgO modified fallen leaf biochar[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(4): 105727.
[54]	SZEWCZUK-KARPISZ K, TOMCZYK A, CELIŃSKA M, et al. Carboxin and diuron adsorption mechanism on sunflower husks biochar and goethite in the single/mixed pesticide solutions[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(10): 2584.
[55]	MANDAL A, KUMAR A, SINGH N. Sorption mechanisms of pesticides removal from effluent matrix using biochar: conclusions from molecular modelling studies validated by single-, binary and ternary solute experiments[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 295: 113104.

改性生物炭类型	农药	表现	文献
蒸汽活化稻壳生物炭	克百威	水蒸气活化进一步提高了生物炭产率和吸附量。700 ℃生产的蒸汽活化生物炭在pH值为5附近出现吸附最大值161 mg·g^-1	[27]
同时共热解热空气活化	2,4-D(2,4-二氯苯氧酸)	与传统缺氧热解产生的生物炭相比,850 ℃共热解的生物具有相似的微孔表面积(约330 m²·g^-1),但约为中孔表面积是其2.5倍,对2,4-D的吸附量达10倍以上	[37]
H₃PO₄,NaOH改性椰壳生物炭	二嗪磷	比表面积关系为BC3(NaOH改性生物炭)>BC2 (H₃PO₄改性生物炭)>BC4(原生物炭),且BC3对二嗪磷具有最大的吸附量。在pH值为7,BC3作为吸附剂剂量为5.0 g·L^-1时,二嗪磷去除率高达98.96%	[38]
ZnCl₂活化烟草生物炭	毒死蜱	与原生物炭相比,AB-ZnCl₂的SSA提高了1 775倍,二者最大吸附量分别为683.30和1 602.40 μg·g^-1	[39]
KOH活化花生壳生物炭	2,4-D	比表面积由于活化增加,最大吸附量活化生物炭250 mg·g^-1>热解生物炭3.02 mg·g^-1	[40]
掺p玉米秸秆生物炭	三嗪类	掺杂增加了表面积和生物炭上的—COOH和—PO₃基团的数量,从而促进吸附过程,来自玉米秸秆(CSWP)的掺杂生物炭,最大吸附量可达79.6 mg·g^-1	[21]
纳米石榴皮生物炭	毒死蜱	最大吸附量比石榴皮提高了25倍,10 min内吸附率约为90%	[41]
酸、碱、磁化改性700 ℃热解玉米秸秆生物炭	多菌灵	3种改性生物炭对多菌灵的吸附能力为磁化生物炭>酸化生物炭>碱化生物炭。磁化生物炭的最大吸附量达到108.1 mg·g^-1	[42]
黏土-白杨生物炭复合材料	草甘膦	复合材料比黏土和生物炭具有更好的吸附能力,吸附动力学符合准二级动力学模型,与 Langmuir模型拟合较好	[43]
载铁风车草生物炭	毒死蜱	铁浸渍的生物炭的表面比原始生物炭更复杂,更多孔,表现出比原始生物炭更高的吸附能力	[44]

改性生物炭类型	农药	表现	文献
蒸汽活化稻壳生物炭	克百威	水蒸气活化进一步提高了生物炭产率和吸附量。700 ℃生产的蒸汽活化生物炭在pH值为5附近出现吸附最大值161 mg·g^-1	[27]
同时共热解热空气活化	2,4-D(2,4-二氯苯氧酸)	与传统缺氧热解产生的生物炭相比,850 ℃共热解的生物具有相似的微孔表面积(约330 m²·g^-1),但约为中孔表面积是其2.5倍,对2,4-D的吸附量达10倍以上	[37]
H₃PO₄,NaOH改性椰壳生物炭	二嗪磷	比表面积关系为BC3(NaOH改性生物炭)>BC2 (H₃PO₄改性生物炭)>BC4(原生物炭),且BC3对二嗪磷具有最大的吸附量。在pH值为7,BC3作为吸附剂剂量为5.0 g·L^-1时,二嗪磷去除率高达98.96%	[38]
ZnCl₂活化烟草生物炭	毒死蜱	与原生物炭相比,AB-ZnCl₂的SSA提高了1 775倍,二者最大吸附量分别为683.30和1 602.40 μg·g^-1	[39]
KOH活化花生壳生物炭	2,4-D	比表面积由于活化增加,最大吸附量活化生物炭250 mg·g^-1>热解生物炭3.02 mg·g^-1	[40]
掺p玉米秸秆生物炭	三嗪类	掺杂增加了表面积和生物炭上的—COOH和—PO₃基团的数量,从而促进吸附过程,来自玉米秸秆(CSWP)的掺杂生物炭,最大吸附量可达79.6 mg·g^-1	[21]
纳米石榴皮生物炭	毒死蜱	最大吸附量比石榴皮提高了25倍,10 min内吸附率约为90%	[41]
酸、碱、磁化改性700 ℃热解玉米秸秆生物炭	多菌灵	3种改性生物炭对多菌灵的吸附能力为磁化生物炭>酸化生物炭>碱化生物炭。磁化生物炭的最大吸附量达到108.1 mg·g^-1	[42]
黏土-白杨生物炭复合材料	草甘膦	复合材料比黏土和生物炭具有更好的吸附能力,吸附动力学符合准二级动力学模型,与 Langmuir模型拟合较好	[43]
载铁风车草生物炭	毒死蜱	铁浸渍的生物炭的表面比原始生物炭更复杂,更多孔,表现出比原始生物炭更高的吸附能力	[44]

生物炭在农药残留吸附方面的研究进展及影响因素

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 55

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	洪铭, 张志祥, 方小雪, 许展豪, 朱恩泽. 西瓜种子进行细菌性果斑病检测的研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(5): 1198-1202.
[2]	杨素雅, 林君瑜, 汪祎铭, 马嘉若, 虎陈霞. 多元生产主体对农业面源污染治理的认知、意愿及影响因素[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(2): 483-488.
[3]	施超宇, 孙晓欣, 吴嵘, 杨勇, 王雪, 肖学喜. 基于UPLC-MS/MS的土壤中敌草隆残留检测技术[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(1): 157-161.
[4]	李玮峰, 厉尹翔, 吴晓斌. 金华婺城区葡萄产业现状与质量安全风险评估[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(8): 1969-1971.
[5]	聂新军, 金娟, 刘银秀, 范志斌, 王强. 农田施用沼液养分损失及其防治对策研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(8): 2014-2017.
[6]	刘超, 余霞奎, 忻雅, 张乐. 草莓果实中新型杀螨剂乙唑螨腈和腈吡螨酯的残留量测定[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(7): 1781-1784.
[7]	林海忠, 何杰, 解崇斌, 陈佳佳, 陈照明, 何莉莉, 陈剑兵, 王强. 不同施肥方案对茭白田土壤氨挥发及茭白产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(6): 1519-1523.
[8]	刘术新, 李汉美, 吴东涛, 刘卓香, 丁枫华. 不同生物炭对连作蚕豆土壤理化性状、产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(5): 1133-1136.
[9]	徐冰洁, 刘臻, 桑力青. 分散固相萃取-气相色谱法测定果蔬中17种有机磷农药及其代谢物残留量[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(5): 1242-1245.
[10]	李绍平, 杨宏力. 贵州省农业生产效率演变及影响因素分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(4): 1009-1017.
[11]	周秀莹, 温馨, 贾晓菲, 谭淑铧, 林庆昶, 黎小鹏. 液相色谱-串联质谱法检测动物源性食品中314种农药残留[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(4): 940-944.
[12]	温馨, 黎小鹏, 谭淑铧, 林庆昶, 贾晓菲, 罗紫萍. 2021年中山市种植蔬菜农药残留及膳食风险评估[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(2): 455-462.
[13]	张继宁, 张鲜鲜, 孙会峰, 王从, 刘善良, 蒲加军, 周胜. “双碳”背景下生物炭基肥的研究现状及展望[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(12): 2825-2830.
[14]	刘岩, 朱加虹, 胡桂仙, 赖爱萍, 王昊, 万玉杰. 国内外猕猴桃农药最大残留限量标准比对[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(1): 15-19.
[15]	钭凌娟, 王琤帅, 陈有来, 吴梅, 李根有, 傅杨群. 覆盆子鞣花酸含量影响因素分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(1): 234-236.